“touching something that is untouchable”
In the same vein as my last post, and from a work done at great legal risk by the documentary makers, the following quotations:
Monsanto, where creative chemistry works wonders for you.
I have never seen a situation where one company could have so much overwhelming influence at the highest levels of regulatory decision making, as an example of Monsanto with its GM food policy and the government.
More powerful than bombs; it’s more powerful than God.
We’re touching something that is untouchable.
The World According to Monsanto
Greasing the Cloud
If there can be found to be any silver lining to such incipiently disastrous events as BP’s recent and ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, it is the reminder that we must be constantly vigilant of the hubris of Humankind and vigourous in demanding that our leaders and policy makers adhere to the wisdom and good leadership protocols embodied in the Precautionary Principle. After all, such man-man catastrophes have always been completely avoidable.
To reprise an earlier blog post:
The proposal of any new law or regulation which comes from [businessmen], ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and ought never to be adopted till after having been long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous, but with the most suspicious attention. It comes from an order of men, whose interest is never exactly the same with that of the public, who have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public, and who accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and oppressed it.
–Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 1, pt. xi, p.10(1776)
Guest Column: Cynical Canadians: Shame on you!
Guest Column Rant
By Curmudgy Mapleblight:
Some might suggest that it is cynical behaviour by Canada’s Conservative federal government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to prorogue parliament in the middle of the Christmas/New Years holiday week, on the eve of New Years eve, when the hearts and minds of the Canadian electorate were presumably taking a break…
Taking a break from:
- heartbreak of first Christmases without friends and relatives lost in a war in Afghanistan that few can make sense of
- the suffering of escalating hardship after a more than year long recession
- the consternation, puzzlement and international embarrassment of the Canadian diplomat James Colvin’s recent Parliamentary Committee testimony over the handling of Afghan detainees
- the deepening international embarrassment of Canada’s grotesquely obvious foot-dragging and role in the failure of the Copenhagen climate summit
- the record numbers of starving Canadian children
- the record numbers of northern First Peoples without access to clean drinking water and safe living conditions
- the record number of unresolved Native land claims
- the record low numbers of surviving family farmers
- growing fear and escalating discomfort stemming from official reactions to that fear for the flying public
- the struggle of families in Canada’s hinterlands struggling with the invasion of their private properties by mining companies
- the lingering uncertainty of impending global pandemics
- and so many other petty issues
But it would be irresponsible—undemocratic—to accuse the government of taking such cynical actions, or for that matter the opposition who has said relatively little in the wake of this latest prorogation—the second in a year—when all these well paid public servants are away from their offices, support staff and other resources they might use to defend themselves, which taxpayers pay for.
Since that damn commie outfit, the CBC began reporting on the new Facebook group Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament ) late yesterday the groups numbers have increased by 25%, as updated in the past couple of hours.
This is ridiculous! You so-called “engaged Canadians” and especially those belonging to that most infernal of special interest groups—FAMILIES—who claim you care about our country, and yet who yourselves so cynically would think so badly of our government, should feel ashamed of yourselves.
You should ignore silly, childish distractions like Facebook and those few remaining ways that citizens have left of engaging in the political process, and get back to your day jobs (and second night, night jobs and off-farm jobs) so you can keep those tax dollars rolling in and keep those big stone buildings in Ottawa heated, and lights on—even if nobody’s home—so the pipes don’t freeze. That way, when the government finally is ready to come back to work, they don’t have to waste more time and our money debating a budget full of emergency building repair bills.
And one more thing: don’t waste your time trying to contact your MP to tell them to get back to work; they’re on vacation for the next Quarter, and won’t be picking up their messages until late March.
Post Script: And for that matter, that damn CBC shouldn’t be allowed to report on such matters of public interest. When the government finally does get back to work, if they ever survive the confidence vote on their budget, they should finish what they started with that despicable band of pinko intellectuals: eliminate their funding altogether: muzzle’em and then scrap’em!!
_________
Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed on this page are for informational purposes only. Mixed Farmin’ makes no claim to the opinions expressed by our guest columnist. Mixed Farmin’, its affiliates and content licensors assume no liability for any inaccurate, delayed or incomplete information, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Royal Dot Connecting On This Epoch’s Most Inconvenient Truth
With the recent visit by The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall to our little colony, there was much chin-wagging on the monarchy debate in the media which left me, as it does usually, sitting on the fence.
Clearly I have misgivings concerning the monarchy’s historically imperial propensities and Great Britain’s unfortunately enduring legacies of colonialism, not only here, but throughout the global shards of that Empire. The monarchy does seem much of the time a barely living anachronism, and undoubtedly must feel a most expensive burden to the British taxpayer, a case well crafted in Canadian documentarian John Curtin’s new film, After Elizabeth II.
However, one point for the monarchy that others have made is the value of having at a country’s disposal a head of state who is relatively immune to the toxic exigencies of party politics within 4-5 year election cycles. An example of such big picture leadership can be seen precisely in The Richard Dimbleby Lecture, titled “Facing the Future” as delivered by HRH The Prince of Wales on July 7th earlier this year at the St James’s Palace State Apartments in London. I was unaware of this speech until I first heard it last night on CBC’s Ideas. It is inconceivable that it might have been written let alone delivered with such authority and passion by even the most enlightened world leader such as US President Barack Obama—tethered as he is to the art of compromise in the trenches of a daily politics dominated by transnational business—let alone by our own, more nakedly polemic and narrowly focused Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. Indeed, such a lecture could only ever be written by someone who resides above such relatively small and short-sighted concerns, while at the same time possessing the economic and social capital that such global leadership would imbue, and with the time: sixty years and counting for this British monarch in waiting.
Incidentally, this speech can be found on the Royal Channel or on HRH’s own site both as video and in transcript. As an participant-observer in media I find it fascinating to assess my own reaction to HRH’s speech as I consume it in its different forms. Even the Prince who partakes in the fun about his odd appearance might not therefore be surprised that his speech has, to me at least, greater weight when heard or read rather than viewed in a visual medium; his physical presentation distracts significantly from his message.
But what a message! He manages to clearly and concisely spell out the connections among some of the most significant facts and difficult ideas of the day, all in well less than an hour. And he delivers this synthesis in voice and text as one of the finest examples of the Queen’s English I’ve heard in some time, which is frankly some small measure of relief given Charles’ apparent destiny to replace her as language guardian.
There is one key assumption of the Prince’s that I must take exception to. He says:
“So, I wonder, is it the case that the problem lies first and foremost not in what we do but in a fracture within us that leads to a limited view of what and where we are in the natural order – and that, therefore, we need urgently to look deeply into ourselves and at the way we perceive the world and our relationship with it? If only because, surely, we all want to bequeath to our children and our grandchildren something other than the nightmare that for so many of us now looms on the horizon. But that threat will not go away just because we deny it. We are standing at a moment of substantial transition where we face the dual challenges of a world view and an economic system that seem to have enormous shortcomings, together with an environmental crisis – including that of climate change – which threatens to engulf us all.”
I have met far too many individuals—often rich and powerful—expressly concerned with their own short-term greed to assume “surely, we all want to bequeath to our children and our grandchildren something other than the nightmare…”. I would urge HRH to investigate this assumption and its implications.
I do agree however with his key implications that one of the greatest threats may been our own complacency. In July 2009, when he delivered this speech, Prince Charles noted that he believed that we only had 96 months left before we passed a point of no return, a tipping point beyond which resuscitation of the environment was still possible before the accelerating momentum of global climate change spins the world into unimaginable disaster. That means we have only 92 months left.
Eating Local in Ontario: An effective message
Not that I’m ever a great fan of food corporations, but kudos to Hellmanns for sponsoring this very effective video:
Official Red Barn Theatre Blog Launched
To those who have contacted me through this blog concerning the events of the past few days, thank you all for your interest, notes, comments and remembrances.
The Official Red Barn Theatre Blog went up late last night at http://redbarntheatre.wordpress.com/. In the coming days photos, video, audio interviews and stories will be added. As well the Official Red Barn Theatre Blog will be the nerve centre for ongoing updates and any further news concerning plans for a rebuilding collection fund, rebuilding and plans for the 60th Diamond Jubilee season of the Red Barn Theatre for summer 2009.
The rest of the Sibbald family and I as well, I’m sure, as other local Red Barn supporters and volunteers would greatly appreciate if you could also send/re-send and post or re-post your comments and stories to the Official Blog. In particular, we are looking for your personal stories and remembrances, the livelier, the better.
Please note that your voices are extremely important to hear: the more support we can get, the easier it may make it to access public and private funding in the future to enable the possibility that the old girl may rise from the ashes.
-Peter
Following the Money in The 905
Recently the independent, non-partisan community organization Vote Toronto published a study by York University professor, Robert MacDermid, “Funding City Politics”, citing the very strong connection between elected politicians and the development industry: nearly 70% of political campaign contributions to the winning politicians come from development related corporations, their friends and families.
And what if you’re a candidate who wants to slow down development and make it more ecologically sustainable?
“You’ve got a tough row to hoe:, says MacDermid.
More from CBC Ontario Today
Vote Toronto offers a comprehensive set of recommended Electoral Reforms
Dewatering for The Big Pipe
Stouffville, Ontario. Dewatering
Approximately 43°56′57.22″N 79°15′7.87″W, facing East, circa October 2, 2005
From my series: Elegy for a Stolen Land
As part of the extension of York Region’s $350 million mega-project known as the “Big Pipe”, a large sewer trunk passes through land along the 9th Line in front of this 19th century farm house. The land is dewatered so that workers can get deep into the ground, at or below the water table, to install the pipe.
This trunk of the pipe, to accommodate growth in Stouffville’s secondary plan, is to move sewage to the Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant near Lake Ontario. Rates of dewatering range from 5,000 – 30,000 litres per minute, and the project stretches well up into the Oak Ridge’s Moraine, the natural aquatic battery for all lands southward to Lake Ontario.
On January 3, 2004 The Toronto Star’s Leslie Ferenc reported in an article entitled Close -up: The Big Pipe, that opponents, from the province’s environment commissioner right on down to farmers and individual farm owners, argue—and officials readily admit—that dewatering process has proven to empty aquifers, parch resident’s wells, bleed streams and fields dry, destroy fish and wildlife habitats, and draw effluent away from failing septic tanks into the wider water table. Proponents argue that they will be able to set things right later by implementing mitigating measures.
Such mitigating measures are planned on the assumption that such measures may yet be invented and successfully implemented.
This and other of The Star’s stories about the Big Pipe are no longer freely available on the internet, but you can find a copy of this one here. Environmental Defence and Lake Ontario WaterKeeper have archived some of that coverage. Otherwise they can be sourced through The Star’s paid archive service.
… Comin up next, “Following the money…”
-
Web Site: http://petersibbald.com
-
Find It
Focus
A fermentation (a.k.a. Compost) of media, technology, social justice, art and the environment as experienced on the ground through the eye of one Canadian photo documentarian, intended to help fertilize the zeitgeist and yield a mixed crop of new ideas surrounding civic engagement.
Origins
Out on the land seeking moments and light, I’m often reminded of the similarity between the life and livelihood of a visual journalist/artist and that of the farmer.
To Wit
“Well Ed, the Fishers had their auction last Saturday morning. I watched as the neighbourhood descended on the place and picked it clean. After it was over, and the Fishers had driven off to their new house in town, the auctioneer walked over the property with me. His name’s Freddy. Interesting chap, friendly and outgoing. Runs a beef and dairy herd on the farm next door, plants corn, grain, potatoes, turnips, does auction sales some blacksmithing, small auto repairs and real estate. What I believe is called mixed farming.”
Letters from Wingfield Farm, ©1989 Douglas Beattie. (Act 1) Wingfield Farm
Ongoing Investigations
• The Meaning of Land
• Rurality
• The Nexus of Technology,
Implimentation and Power in
Visual Communication
• Legacies of Colonialism
• Sustainability vs. Resilience in
Socio-Ecological Systems
